Dear Colleague,
The always interesting Education
Matters, a publication of the Association of American Educators, has a very
interesting cover story in its March 2013 issue. “International Case Study:
Real Lessons from Finland” by Fordham Institute scholar Kathleen Porter-Magee
examines how Finland developed a world-class education system.
In the 1960s,
Finland’s education system looked far different than it does today. Achievement
was much more uneven and not all students had equal access to quality
schooling. In 1968, as part of a nationwide focus on better preparing students
to compete in the knowledge economy, the Finnish Parliament enacted legislation
to create a new basic education system that was built around the development of
a common “comprehensive” school for grades 1 through 9—a system that spread to
every municipality in the nation by 1977. Three things characterized the
new Finnish standard:
1. The development and
adoption of a mandatory national curriculum that ensured all students were held
to the same rigorous standards.
2. Dramatic changes in
teacher preparation and certification requirements.
3. A central state
inspectorate that evaluated school-level teaching and learning.
Can we replicate Finland, using their methods as a roadmap?
Maybe. Maybe not. To find out more, go
to http://www.aaeteachers.org/images/em/2013marchnews.pdf and see
what you think.
On February 27th, United Way sponsored a major
reform event in Los Angeles. The “Mayor’s Panel” wrapped up the six hour
event. Three education activist mayors –
Los Angeles’s Antonio Villaraigosa, Chicago’s Rahm Emanuel and Newark’s Cory
Booker had a conversation about what is going on in their cities. Whether you
agree with mayoral control or not, it is becoming a trend and needs to be
examined. To watch the panel event, go to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdr2avJk9Bc
On March 5th, I participated in a panel
discussion in Mountain View, the video of which is
now available. Stanford professor Terry Moe, former state senator Gloria
Romero, CTA president Dean Vogel and I each gave a 10 minute opening talk.
Then, before the Q&A, we were each given 5 minutes to expand on what we
said in our opening or to rebut what another panelist had said their opening.
Unfortunately, the format did not allow for any direct engagement. I say
“unfortunately" because I had about 500 or so questions that I would have
loved to pose to Mr. Vogel. In any event, if you are interested in watching a
part of this, I suggest going directly to the secondary comments which begin at
12:00 of the second tape. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4ARL1hESEE&list=PL0z6BttMYc9yMcV0tcrLegP0qE57xc8ow)
In the “hubris” department, Mexico
has (had?) a union boss who perhaps went a “bit” too far. A few weeks ago, Elba
Esther Gordillo, 68, leader of the powerful, 1.5 million-member National Union
of Education Workers, was arrested at the Toluca airport near Mexico City and
charged with embezzling 2 billion pesos (about $160 million) from union funds.
Prosecutors said they
had detected nearly $3 million in purchases at Neiman Marcus using union funds,
as well as $17,000 in U.S. plastic surgery bills and the purchase of a
million-dollar home in San Diego.
…Gordillo displayed her opulence openly with designer clothes and bags, bodyguards, expensive cars and properties including a penthouse apartment in Mexico City's exclusive Polanco neighborhood. She has been widely lampooned for her many plastic surgeries and depicted in political cartoons as ghoulish. Meanwhile, Mexico's teachers are poorly paid and public education has long been considered sub-par.
To read more, go to http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/02/27/authorities-jail-head-mexico-powerful-teachers-union-on-embezzlement-charges/
According
to a new study, students in KIPP charter schools experience significantly
greater learning gains in math, reading, science, and social studies than do
their peers in traditional public schools.
The study, which analyzed data from 43
middle schools run by KIPP, officially known as the Knowledge Is Power Program,
was conducted by Mathematica Policy
Research, a research
center based in Princeton, N.J. It concludes that students in the charter
program, over a three-year period, gained an additional 11 months of learning
in math, eight additional months in reading, 14 additional months of learning
in science, and 11 additional months of learning in social studies when
compared to students in comparable traditional public schools.
To read more about the study’s findings, go to http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/charterschoice/2013/02/kipp_schools_boost_academic_performance_study_finds.html
The “value added” debate continues. In a recent National
Council on Teacher Quality blog, Hannah Putman reports on researcher Dan
Goldhaber’s study on whether or not the “‘one
score fits all subjects’ assumption holds for elementary teachers, who often
teach multiple subjects. Is an elementary teacher who teaches math effectively
also an effective reading teacher, and vice versa?” She goes on to say that the
findings suggest
…that while teachers' efficacy is largely
consistent, it is not exactly the same across all subjects. Applying a VAM
score from one subject to encompass a teacher's overall ability may be right
most of the time, but stronger policies will recognize that this supposed VAM
mirror image has some imperfections.
To
read the rest of Putman’s post and access Goldhaber’s study, go to http://www.nctq.org/p/tqb/viewStory.jsp?id=33584
The
recent school board election in Los Angeles received much media attention, in
part due to the fact the vote was seen as something of a referendum on
Superintendent John Deasy’s reform measures. But perhaps the bigger issue – for
some, including the teachers unions – was the fact that “outside money” was
given to the reform candidates, most notably a $1 million contribution from New
York City mayor Michael Bloomberg. To read a balanced view of the outside money
v. inside money debate, former Los Angeles school board members Marlene Canter
and Yolie Flores wrote a very even-handed op-ed –http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_22701724/marlene-canter-and-yolie-flores-lausd-board-race
Early
childhood education continues to be a hot topic, with various pundits and
politicians claiming that money spent on pre-school will reap benefits far
exceeding the costs of such an endeavor. President Obama weighed in, using his State
of the Union address to try to sell the country on his new plan which is based
upon “successes” in Georgia and Oklahoma. However, there is another side to
this story, as Reason Foundation’s Lisa Snell and Shikha Dalmia basically
debunk his assertions in the Wall Street Journal:
Oklahoma
implemented its program in 1998 and is the pet of universal preschool activists
because it’s a red state that has diligently applied their playbook. It spends
about $8,000 per preschooler, about the same as on K-12. Its teachers are
credentialed, well-paid, abundant (one per 10 children) and use a
professionally designed curriculum. Georgia expanded a pre-K program for
high-risk children to all 4-year-olds in 1995.
Both
programs are voluntary and involve the private sector. Oklahoma pays churches
and other community providers for the children they enroll. Georgia effectively
hands parents a $4,500 voucher for a qualified preschool. Both states have
participation rates well above the 47% national preschool average, and
Oklahoma’s 75% enrollment rate is the highest in the country.
Yet
neither state program has demonstrated major social benefits. The first batch
of children who attended preschool in Georgia, in 1995, are now turning 22, so
Mr. Obama’s claim that they are better at “holding jobs” and “forming stable
families” can’t be true.
But
what about, say, teenage girls staying out of trouble? Teen birth rates have
declined in the past 10 years in Georgia and Oklahoma (as they have
nationwide), but both states remain far above the national average. In 2005,
Georgia had the eighth-highest teen-birth rate and Oklahoma the
seventh-highest, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Now Georgia has
the 13th-highest, Oklahoma the fifth-highest. Many states without universal
preschool have a far better record.
To read the rest of the op-ed, go to http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324662404578329873460933586.html
And finally, we still have a limited number of t-shirts
available. They are navy blue with the CTEN logo on front and “A resource for
all who care about education” printed on the back. They come preshrunk, in
small, medium, large and extra large. If you would like one, all you have to do
is make a $15 donation to CTEN via PayPal - http://www.ctenhome.org/donate.htm - and let us know
what size and where to send it and we will get it out to you promptly.
As always, thanks for your continued interest and support
of CTEN.
Sincerely,
Larry
Sand
CTEN President