Dear Colleague,
Regarding California’s new “bathroom law,” which we reported
on in June and August, there is an update. The organization that is trying to
stall the bill’s implementation would appear to have enough signatures to qualify
the issue for an initiative. “Privacy For All Students” needed 505,000
endorsers and managed to get over 600,000, so now the vetting process begins.
If enough valid signatures have been secured, the law will not become effective
on Jan. 1, 2014 as planned, but would go before the voters a year from now.
The law can be accessed here - http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB1266 The “Privacy For All Students” website is
here - http://privacyforallstudents.com/home-2
Common Core will affect just about every public school
teacher in California. While there is no shortage of articles on the national
standards – pro and con – we found this one to be especially poignant. Koret
Task Force scholar Eric Hanushek views it as a distraction. In US News & World Report, he writes,
Policymakers and
reform advocates alike have rallied around introducing a set of national
content standards, suggesting that this will jump-start the stagnating
achievement of U.S. students. As history clearly indicates, simply calling for
students to know more is not the same as ensuring they will learn more.
Discussions of the Common Core standards are actually sucking all of the air
out of the room, distracting attention from any serious efforts to reform our
schools.
… We currently have
very different standards across states, and experience from the states provides
little support for the argument that simply declaring more clearly what we want
children to learn will have much impact. Proponents of national standards point
to Massachusetts: strong standards and top results. But California, a second
state noted for its high learning standards, balances Massachusetts: strong
standards and bottom results. In other words, what really matters is what is
actually taught in the classroom. Just setting a different goal – even if
backed by intensive professional development, new textbooks, etc. – has not
historically had much influence as we look across state outcomes.
To read the rest of Hanushek’s piece, go to http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2013/10/28/common-core-standards-distract-from-real-educational-reform
Because our state legislature can’t seem to come up with a bill that would get rid of pedophiles and other undesirables from the classroom, a law firm has decided to bypass Sacramento and take it directly to the voters. Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk submitted a proposed ballot measure they are calling the “Stop Child Molesters, Sexual Abusers and Drug Dealers from Working in California Schools Act.” (http://laschoolreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/STOP-CHILD-MOLESTERS-SEXUAL-ABUSERS-DRUG-DEALERS-FROM-WORKING-IN-CA-SCHOOLS-ACT.pdf )
Should the initiative become law, the
California Education Code would be amended. The essence of the proposal:
Current law includes loopholes for
school employees perpetrating egregious misconduct to remain on the public
payroll and earn continuing retirement credit for excessive time after having
been charged in writing with committing egregious misconduct and being notified
of a decision to terminate employment thereby increasing the dismissal costs to
school districts and draining resources from schools and the children they
serve.
School employees perpetrating egregious
misconduct in California have exploited loopholes to delay and conceal
dismissal proceedings manipulating school districts to pay-off, reassign, enter
into agreements to expunge evidence of egregious misconduct from district
personnel files, and approve secret settlement agreements enabling the school
employee to continue to perpetrate offenses in other schools and school
districts, thereby infringing on the inalienable right of students and staff to
attend public primary, elementary, junior high, and senior high school campuses
which are safe, secure and peaceful as guaranteed by the Constitution of the
State of California.
Accordingly, the People of the State of
California declare that to secure the constitutional guarantee of students and
staff to be safe and secure in their persons at public primary, elementary,
junior high and senior high school campuses, school districts must have the
appropriate statutory authority to expeditiously remove and permanently dismiss
perpetrators of egregious misconduct without facing lengthy and costly
litigation or creating incentives to transfer the school employee to another
assignment, school or school district.
According to LA School Report’s Vanessa Romo, the Attorney General’s office has
until December 23rd to title and summarize the initiative. After
that, proponents have 150 days to circulate a petition throughout the state and
collect 504,760 signatures. (http://laschoolreport.com/ca-ballot-initiative-would-target-child-abusers-drug-dealers/)
Learning by rote memory has gotten a
bad rap of late, but is there a place for it? New York teacher and writer David
Bonagura certainly thinks there is. In “What's 12 x 11? Um, Let Me Google That,”
he makes a strong case.
Memorization is the most effective means to build that foundation. Yet drilling multiplication tables, learning to spell, and reciting formulas and rules are almost nowhere to be found in today's classrooms, tarred as antithetical to true learning and even harmful for students.
To read this important article, go to http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303471004579165310256329006
George
Leef, Director of Research of the John W. Pope Center for Higher Education
Policy, has written a provocative piece which claims that American schools of
education are “A Key Reason Why American Students Do Poorly.” Much has been
written about our education schools of late, but if the product of these
schools is so poor, why isn’t there pressure for serious change?
The answer is that they are protected by
state licensing laws that make it very hard for public school officials to hire
anyone who doesn’t have the obligatory credentials. In short, the ed schools
have a guaranteed market and are shielded from competition. The professors and
administrators are happy with the way things are, and often express resentment
at anyone who suggests that their courses and philosophy do not lead to
competent teachers.
To continue reading go here - http://www.forbes.com/sites/georgeleef/2013/10/24/a-key-reason-why-american-students-do-poorly/
A companion piece in the Wall Street Journal makes pretty much the same case. “Why Teacher Colleges Get a Flunking Grade” can be found here - http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304864504579143902608329802
Regarding agency fee payers - we sincerely hope that if you are an existing agency fee payer, you have sent in a request for your rebate. The November 15th deadline has passed. If you haven't filed by now, you will not get your rebate this year. However, if you are a first time filer, you may resign from the union after the 15th. However, you will not get the full amount, but rather a prorated one, depending on how long after the 15th you file. For more information, please visit http://www.ctenhome.org/know.htm
And finally, has the
Affordable Care Act affected any of you in any way? If so, please let me know. If
there are any horror stories, we can share them and hopefully do some helpful
networking.
If you are interested in giving CTEN brochures to
colleagues, you can print them right from the home page - http://www.ctenhome.org/index.htm Or, if you prefer, we will be happy to send
you as many preprinted ones as you need. Also, anyone wishing to donate to CTEN
can do so very simply through PayPal - http://www.ctenhome.org/donate.htm As a non-profit, we exist only through the
generosity of others.
Sincerely,
Larry Sand
CTEN President
